This eFLYER was developed in HTML for viewing with Microsoft Internet Explorer while connected to the Internet: View Online.
To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add eFLYER@barnstormers.com to your address book or list of approved senders.
Barnstormers Logo

ISSUE 162 - March 2011
Over 8,000 Total Ads Listed
1,000+ NEW Ads Per Week

  Home     Browse All Classifieds     eFLYERs     Events     Testimonials     Post Ad     Search Ads  
BARNSTORMERS eFLYER... a collective effort of the aviation community.
YOUR photos, videos, comments, reports, stories, and more...
Click to Subscribe
SEND BARNSTORMERS eFLYER TO A FRIEND
"My Flying Car" - Again

By David Rose, Contributing Editor
San Diego, California

Rich Strong is one of those visionary men after my own heart.

He’s an engineer, (who’s who in science and engineering) who decided fifty years ago that it was time for a flying car. His efforts are well chronicled on his website where you may follow the development of his “StrongMobile Flying Car Project”.
On the website there is a telling statement, ”The overwhelming majority of the people Rich has talked with say they want a StrongMobile.” I think we all know that what they’re really saying is that, no matter what it looks like, or how it works, they want a flying car. Don’t we all.
And now we see not only do we, the normal everyday folk who just want an easier way to get from here to there, but our ‘governments’ are way more interested then we had imagined.

If money has been the problem (let alone imagination, creativity and genius) then our worries are over. DARPA to the rescue! (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). Yup. DARPA. That great creator of concepts is interested. DARPA is willing to loosen it’s (our) purse strings up to $54 million over the life of the program for, as they put it, a vehicle with “terrain-independent mobility.”

Now everybody is on the bandwagon. Companies everywhere are dusting off old concepts as well as developing new ideas of all kinds. My flying car is just around the corner.

DARPA’s criterion? No runway. Vertical take off and land. No special infrastructure. The thing must also have an unrefueled range of 250 nautical miles and high standard of safety. Sounds expensive. Maybe “my flying car” is a little further down the block than I thought.


I’ll keep you posted.

Read more in Clay Dillow’s article in PopSci and Jeremy Hsu’s “The Pentagon agency hopes to have a $43 million VTOL SUV in the air by 2015”.
By David Rose, Contributing Editor

Return to eFLYER

 
Visit www.barnstormers.com - post an ad to be viewed by nearly 1,000,000 visitors per month.
Over 15 years bringing more online buyers and sellers together than any other aviation marketplace.
Don't just advertise. Get RESULTS with Barnstormers.com. Check out the Testimonials
Copyright © 2007-2011 All rights reserved.
UNSUBSCRIBE INSTRUCTIONS: If you no longer wish to receive this eFLYER, unsubscribe here or mail a written request to the attention of: eFLYER Editor BARNSTORMERS, INC. 312 West Fourth Street, Carson City, NV 89703. NOTE: If you registered for one or more hangar accounts on barnstormers.com, you must opt out of all of them so the eFLYER mailings will be fully discontinued.